Washington, D.C. — In a letter to Hyundai's U.S. CEO, Consumer Watchdog has asked the company to pull its prominent "40 MPG" claim from advertising for the Elantra model until the EPA re-tests the auto. Further examination of consumer complaints and independent test data show the Elantra at "the bottom of the heap" in meeting its overall mileage claims, said the letter, enough to make the MPG claims deceptive for consumers who seek to purchase the highest-MPG auto, said the group.

The letter responding to Hyundai's defense of the Elantra emphasizes the compact auto's shortfall in city and combined driving, which is what urban and suburban drivers do. This California consumer complaint, quoted in the letter, appears typical of what such drivers are finding:

"I've owned a 2011 Hyundai Elantra Limited since June 2011 and my average gas rating is about 18 or 19 miles per gallon. Most of my driving is city driving, but that's still nowhere near the 29 city mpg rating by Hyundai. I completely bought this car with the claimed "29/40 mpg" in mind. It was the primary reason I bought the car. So I could save money. And I'm hugely disappointed it's not living up to that claim."

See the full letter to Hyundai at http://www.consumerwatchdog.org/resources/elantra-dh-1.pdf

Consumer Watchdog earlier asked the Environmental Protection Agency, which oversees automakers' MPG claims, to re-test the Elantra in its own facilities. Typically, companies test the cars themselves and report the results to the EPA.

See the EPA letter at http://www.consumerwatchdog.org/resources/ltrepaelantra11292011.pdf

The letter asks Hyundai to pull or modify its mileage claims in advertising until the EPA retest, saying:
"We… urge you to remove or qualify your prominent MPG claims in your holiday advertising until re-testing validates or disputes Hyundai's tests. We note that you have purchased prime slots during the Super Bowl. With this mileage issue in the public arena, Consumer Watchdog believes you should acknowledge the real-world gap to potential buyers, or risk losing their trust."

"Hyundai admits its Elantra is performing well below the self-tested mileage claims on its sticker," said Jamie Court, president of Consumer Watchdog. "It has a duty to pull or modify the MPG claims in its advertising before more consumers are deceived and buy the Elantra under false pretenses.

Among other things, Consumer Watchdog has found that, while shortfalls in city and sometimes combined MPG are common, Elantra is at the bottom of the heap. It recorded shortfalls of 12% and 29% in Consumers Union and Motor Trend tests of the Elantra's 33 MPG combined claim. Furthermore, in the thorough and expert testing of Consumers Union, most similar models get about 3% "over "their EPA-sanctioned highway MPG number, while the Elantra is slightly under.

Even the most mileage-obsessed drivers, at Fuelly.com, couldn't get their Elantras close to the 33 MPG claim, said the letter.

The letter to U.S. CEO John Krafcik said:

Dear Mr. Krafcik,

Hyundai's surging sales in the United States have made the company the seventh-largest seller nationally. In combination with sister company Kia you are the fourth-largest, behind only GM, Ford and Toyota, according to November's industry sales figures. Hyundai owes it to American consumers to be scrupulously truthful about its cars' performance, including the much ballyhooed miles per gallon (MPG) of the company's rising star, the compact Elantra. However, at least when it comes to the Elantra, your marketing is misleading Americans.

Though there is always some expected imprecision in the "EPA-certified" MPG rating of automobiles, the Elantra appears to be a good deal outside of this expected variation, especially when compared to other cars of its type. Hyundai's prominent advertising campaign emphasizes the Elantra's "40 MPG" EPA highway and 33 MPG combined, but in the real world your cars deliver much less. Indeed, the Elantra doesn't even get as many miles per gallon as some competing compact models that advertise more modest and realistic MPG.

Consumers need to know that if they buy an Elantra because it compares favorably with similar cars' MPG, they are likely to find that the Elantra does no better and sometimes worse than the other options in the market.

Since, like other automakers, you largely conduct your own EPA MPG testing and report it to the agency, you should be joining Consumer Watchdog in urging the EPA to independently re-test the Elantra to confirm or correct Hyundai's testing.

We also urge you to remove or qualify your prominent MPG claims in your holiday advertising until re-testing validates or disputes Hyundai's tests. We note that you have purchased prime slots during the Super Bowl. With this mileage issue in the public arena, Consumer Watchdog believes you should acknowledge the real-world gap to potential buyers, or risk losing their trust.

As you know, Consumer Watchdog has, on the basis of customer complaints and the reports of independent testers, asked the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency to re-test your stated 29/40 MPG figures for the Elantra compact. Your public response to that letter indirectly acknowledges that Hyundai's real-world drivers often match your EPA numbers, as tested by your company and reported to the EPA.

Your company said: "Real-world fuel economy results often differ from EPA label values, depending on driving conditions, amount of stop-and-go/idling, driver habits, weather, and many other factors."

That statement is correct, and EPA numbers, especially for city driving, can be difficult to meet. But our criticism was over degree of failure. Buyers are actively seeking the best MPG in a time of high gas prices and sensitivity to the environment. We have compared the Elantra's independently measured MPG to its EPA rating (Consumers Union, Motor Trend and Fuelly were among our sources) and it is consistently at or near the bottom of the heap, meaning drivers are paying more for fuel, and polluting more, than in cars with lower EPA averages but better real-world performance.

Hyundai also said in its response: "For example, a 20 MPG car that falls short of its fuel economy rating by 10 percent is off by only 2 MPG. But a 40 MPG car driven in real-world conditions that drive a 10 percent reduction is off by a much more noticeable 4 MPG."

Yet real-world testing makes even 10% off the mark look good. Elantra's Motor Trend test average was a mere 25.9 MPG, off by 21% from your claimed 33MPG. Consumers Union put its average at 29 mpg, missing your mark in their test by 12%. A USA Today reviewer got a measly 22 MPG average, a full 33% off your claimed combined mileage, yet Hyundai's response to him was that nothing was wrong with the car, implying that it must be the driver's fault.

In a separate category are Fuelly.com reports (from the most conservative fuel-conscious drivers), that measured the Elantra at 6.7% below stated MPG combined-in the Fuelly world, that put Elantra at the bottom of 12 models claiming to get 40 MPG in some fashion. The Honda CRV, at the middle of the pack, "exceeded "its EPA combined rating of 36 MPG by 8.3%. This means consumers are getting a poor relative value when they buy the Elantra on the basis of MPG. This is especially disturbing to city drivers.

One of the drivers who complained to Consumer Watchdog said:

"I've owned a 2011 Hyundai Elantra Limited since June 2011 and my average gas rating is about 18 or 19 miles per gallon. Most of my driving is city driving, but that's still nowhere near the 29 city mpg rating by Hyundai. I completely bought this car with the claimed "29/40 mpg" in mind. It was the primary reason I bought the car. So I could save money. And I'm hugely disappointed it's not living up to that claim."

Yet when a USA Today reporter called Hyundai regarding our earlier letter to the EPA, your spokesperson said "the numbers are the numbers" and drivers should get the posted mileage "unless you drive like a maniac." That's an insult to careful drivers who bought the car specifically for its MPG rating.

Yes, many cars to do not meet their EPA ratings. But few are as far off as the Elantra. In fact, of 10 mass-market 2012 compact sedans for which we compared Consumer Reports results, all but two "exceeded" their claimed highway mileage by an average of 3.3 MPG, about a 10% gain for most. One was right at the EPA MPG. Only the Elantra was under, by 1 MPG. That's more than a 4 MPG real-world gap on highway MPG, meaning many buyers are making a choice based on faulty data. (The models compared were Elantra, Kia Forte, Nissan Sentra, Mazda 3, Toyota Corolla, Honda Civic, Chevrolet Cruze, Ford Focus, Volkswagen Jetta diesel, Mitsubishi Lancer and Volkswagen Jetta SE)

In your Elantra advertising, you prominently feature only your "40 mpg" claim. Yet the dismal independent test and real-world results for your city and combined mileage claims mean buyers are unable to make accurate comparisons. This is in effect a deception, and one we ask you to discontinue in your advertising while awaiting a welcome EPA re-evaluation.

– 30 –

Visit our website at: http://www.ConsumerWatchdog.org