L.A. Drops Lawsuit Over DWP Billing Errors. Now Ratepayers Could Owe Millions

Published on


September 26, 2019


The city of Los Angeles moved Thursday to abandon its high-profile lawsuit against PricewaterhouseCoopers in what amounts to a stunning defeat for City Atty. Mike Feuer, who had tried to blame the consulting firm for the massive overbilling debacle at the Department of Water and Power.

City attorney spokesman Rob Wilcox said that key witnesses in the city’s case — namely David Wright, the former head of DWP, and Paul Paradis, an attorney who formerly consulted for Feuer’s office — have invoked their 5th Amendment right against self-incrimination, impairing the city’s ability to proceed with its lawsuit.

Wright and Paradis also were named in a recent FBI search warrant, in which investigators were seeking information about potential crimes, including bribery and financial kickbacks.

“Unable to overcome the current circumstances, the city is dismissing its case,” Wilcox said.

Feuer’s office had aggressively pursued the case in an effort to recoup potentially hundreds of millions of dollars resulting from the 2013 overbilling fiasco. The city’s legal retreat shuts down — at least for now — more scrutiny over its handling of the fallout.

It also means DWP ratepayers will be left with the costs from the billing debacle and possible payouts arising from lawsuits over the alleged fraud surrounding the city’s handling of a class-action lawsuit over the billing errors.

A 2018 DWP document estimated that the associated costs to comply with the settlement could be as much as $300 million.

Consumer Watchdog President Jamie Court called the decision to dismiss the case a plan to “silence” the investigation. He also questioned whether it was politically motivated, given that Feuer has publicly said he is considering running for mayor in 2022.

“The city shouldn’t be allowed to dismiss this case before there’s full disclosure. Ratepayer money is being left on the table,” Court said.

The city sued PricewaterhouseCoopers in 2015, alleging the firm misrepresented its ability to implement new billing software at the DWP. Hundreds of thousands of customers were overbilled two years earlier and the city moved to pay out $67 million to settle a class-action lawsuit brought by ratepayers.

But the city’s lawsuit against PricewaterhouseCoopers was eclipsed by more recent allegations of fraud and double-dealing by attorneys hired by Feuer to sue the consulting firm. The allegations culminated in July in an FBI raid of the DWP’s headquarters and the city attorney’s office.

PricewaterhouseCoopers’ attorney, Daniel Thomasch, said in a statement Thursday that the consulting firm intends to pursue monetary sanctions against the city for litigation misconduct. Some experts estimate that PricewaterhouseCoopers has spent a seven-figure sum fighting the city’s case.

The firm’s “defense has revealed that the DWP perpetrated a fraud on the court, on [PricewaterhouseCoopers], and on the DWP’s own customers, in its attempt to cover up its own failures,” Thomasch said.

Also on Thursday, the city filed court documents seeking to freeze legal fees given to two attorneys who worked on the class-action lawsuit brought against the DWP over the billing errors. The filing marks the first time that the city moved to recoup money following revelations about the alleged misconduct by attorneys.

The decision opens up a new line of litigation over the settlement, and could raise more questions about what city attorneys and DWP officials knew. The settlement was called a “charade” at an August hearing by the judge who oversaw it.

PricewaterhouseCoopers alleged in court documents that attorneys working for Feuer’s office took part in a scheme to quickly settle the class-action lawsuit brought by DWP ratepayers by hand-picking the plaintiff and the opposing attorneys who filed the claim, according to court testimony.

Feuer’s office has denied wrongdoing and cast blame on two outside attorneys it hired. However, one of those attorneys, Beverly Hills lawyer Paul Kiesel, told The Times that his work was done at the “express direction” of Feuer’s office.

Paradis, another attorney who worked on the case, went on to secure a no-bid contract with the DWP worth more than $30 million. Paradis has also denied wrongdoing.

Spokesman Wilcox said the DWP’s board of commissioners consented to the dismissal of the case. He didn’t respond to a question about when the board did so.

DWP General Manager Marty Adams said in a statement that “we are naturally very disappointed by the turn of events that has led to the withdrawal of litigation that was aimed at holding (PricewaterhouseCoopers] accountable for their actions.”

Also, newly released emails show that an attorney working for the city raised red flags about the fees paid to the attorney representing the class in the ratepayer case. The city attorney questioned the fees because she said the settling lawyer did little demonstrable work in the case.

Dakota Smith covers Los Angeles Mayor Eric Garcetti and City Hall for the Los Angeles Times.

Consumer Watchdog
Consumer Watchdoghttps://consumerwatchdog.org
Providing an effective voice for American consumers in an era when special interests dominate public discourse, government and politics. Non-partisan.

Latest Videos

Latest Releases

In The News

Latest Report

Support Consumer Watchdog

Subscribe to our newsletter

To be updated with all the latest news, press releases and special reports.

More Releases