‘Everything’s On The Table’ — Insurance Commissioner Could Issue Emergency Regulations To Help Crisis

Published on

The state’s Insurance Commissioner is being accused of not using his full powers to help people losing home insurance.

By Becca Habegger, KXTV ABC TV-10 NEWS, Sacramento, CA

August 28, 2019


AUBURN, California — A consumer advocacy group is accusing California Insurance Commissioner Ricardo Lara of not doing everything in his power to help tens of thousands of homeowners.

They’re losing their insurance or seeing premiums skyrocket after back-to-back years of destructive, deadly wildfires, which led to expensive payouts for insurance companies.

The group, called Consumer Watchdog, wrote an open letter to Lara on Tuesday.

“As Insurance Commissioner, you have broad power that you are not using to prevent insurance companies from unfairly penalizing homeowners,” Consumer Watchdog Executive Director Carmen Balber wrote. “There is a way, now it is up to you to demonstrate the will.”

ABC10 asked Lara to respond to the letter Wednesday night, following a packed meeting he led at the Gold Country Fairgrounds in Auburn.

“You really feel people’s emotions. You feel that sense of desperation that they have when they lose their coverage and how that impacts everything,” Lara told ABC10 News, responding to what he heard at the meeting, adding his department is seeking more authority from State Legislature “to be able to better protect our consumers.”

It was his second stop in a town hall tour of fire-prone counties, which he launched last week with a filled-to-overflow gathering in El Dorado County.

RELATED: Insurance Commissioner ‘hopeful’ he can help homeowners losing coverage

Craig and Becky Casey attended Wednesday’s meeting. They’ve lived in the Placer County community of North Auburn for more than 20 years. During that time, they say, Nationwide was their insurance company, but the company dropped them in February, even after the Caseys spent some $7,500 to clear trees and bushes around their home to protect it from wildfires.

Post by BeccaReports.

They’re now cobbling together insurance from two different carriers, including the California FAIR Plan, considered fire insurance of last resort – which for many people is now the only resort. Altogether, the Caseys are paying more than three times what they used to pay. Craig Casey is retired and therefore on a fixed income.

“It’s unfortunate. We need insurance so we have to pay it,” Casey told ABC10 News before Wednesday’s meeting. “I appreciate that insurance companies are in the business to make money, but they are taking full advantage of this fire situation in this state, as far as I’m concerned, and I want to know what [Commissioner Lara] can do about it.”

RELATED: ‘It’s a major concern’ | California homeowners struggle to buy fire insurance 

Consumer Watchdog wants to know, too. In her letter, Balber outlines three emergency rules she says Lara can issue now to protect homeowners.

She wants Lara to require each insurance company that does business in California to offer a discount to homeowners who make investments in hardening their home against wildfires – work like that which the Caseys did, clearing trees and bushes. She likens it to automobile insurance companies giving discounts to safe drivers.

Lara agrees with that idea – just not the approach.

“Why can’t insurance companies provide these discounts? And it also incentivizes good behavior, which is exactly what we want,” he said. “But right now, we don’t have the authority to force them – meaning the insurance companies – to write in these communities.”

He said he’d prefer state lawmakers pass legislation giving his department authority rather than him having to issue emergency regulations.

“It’s always good to have that statute and to have the Legislature support us and have that in law so it’s clear and no insurance company tries to undermine our authority,” Lara said. “All options are on the table.”

RELATED: Insurance companies drop coverage for hundreds of thousands of homeowners in high wildfire-risk areas, report shows 

Consumer Watchdog is also asking Lara to “bar the use of claims software that low-balls the cost of repair and reconstruction” and stop insurance companies from using any wildfire risk models “that lead to excessive or discriminatory rates,” citing the FireLine® score, which is now infamous to homeowners in fire-prone areas. Insurance companies use it to determine homeowners’ fire risk and whether to sell them fire insurance.

“We feel that, as a Department, it’s important to get that statute and get that law in place so it’s very clear that we have the authority to open this ‘black box’ and validate these models,” Lara said, referring to the secretive algorithms and risk assessment models insurance companies use, like the FireLine® score.

Lara told ABC10 at last week’s town hall meeting that he’s hopeful the Legislature can pass some laws helping this problem.

However, the legislative session ends in mid-September. 

RELATED: ‘It needs immediate action’ | Homeowners desperate for affordable insurance in fire-prone areas 

ABC10 asked Lara whether he’d consider issuing emergency regulations if he couldn’t get lawmakers to pass needed changes.

“Absolutely, we’re open to everything,” Lara said. “We’re open to emergency regs, we’re open to legislative solutions. Everything’s on the table, like I said. The need is great.”

In the meantime, the California Department of Insurance is offering 10 tips for homeowners facing non-renewed or extra-expensive insurance, in both English and Spanish.

While Craig Casey said he doesn’t like the idea of increased government involvement, “I really think that until the insurance companies learn how to play fair in this environment, that something needs to be done.”

In 2017, insurance companies’ loss ratio was 201%. In other words, companies paid out $2 for every $1 they took in, Department of Insurance officials said. In 2018, insurance companies’ loss ratio was more than 100%. Granted, CDI officials said, those companies have made a lot of money in previous years, though loss ratios in California typically hover around 50%, or keeping half of every dollar they take in.

Lara has more of town halls coming up, including one on Thursday night in Tuolumne County. That starts at 6 p.m. at the Opera Hall in Sonora.

Other upcoming meetings include San Bernardino County Sept. 12, Calaveras County Sept. 16 and Butte County Sept. 19, details to come.

What is the California FAIR Plan?

The State Legislature helped establish the California Fair Access to Insurance Requirements (FAIR) Plan more than 50 years ago.

“It is an insurance pool established to assure the availability of basic property insurance to people who own insurable property in the State of California and who, beyond their control, have been unable to obtain insurance in the voluntary insurance market,” the plan’s website says.

RELATED: Nonprofit creates map showing communities most vulnerable to potential wildfires 

It’s not a state agency, and it doesn’t involve any public or taxpayer dollars. But people who can’t get fire insurance through any other avenue can get it through the California FAIR Plan.

So what if my insurance company drops me for fire coverage?

The California Department of Insurance’s hotline, 1-800-927-HELP, can help homeowners determine their next steps. There are also online resources HERE.

Most major insurance companies you’ve heard of are called admitted carriers, but there are other insurance companies where people can get fire insurance. Those are called not-admitted carriers or “surplus” carriers, and they include Lloyd’s of London.

How does my insurance company decide whether to drop me or raise rates?

“Hardening” your house, or making your home and yard as fire-proof as possible by clearing brush and creating “defensible space” – doesn’t make a difference in insurance premiums, El Dorado Hills insurance agency owner Christopher Kerksieck told ABC10 News in May.

Insurance companies use something called a FireLine® score to determine your home’s fire risk and whether to sell you fire insurance – and at what price, Kerksieck said.

RELATED: How to build a wildfire defensible space around your home

“They’re using mapping technology to find out where the house sits,” Kerksieck said.

The product’s website says FireLine®  judges wildfire risk on a home-by-home basis using advanced remote sensing and digital mapping technology to determine the effect of the three primary factors that contribute to wildfire risk:

  • fuel — grass, trees, and dense brush feed a wildfire
  • slope — steeper slopes can increase the speed and intensity of wildfire
  • access — limited road access and dead ends can impede firefighting equipment

“That gives a score between zero and 30. The higher the score, the worse it is,” Kerksieck said.

He added that most companies won’t offer a homeowner fire insurance if that person’s FireLine®  score is above a three. In past years, he said, some companies were insuring people with scores of up to nine.

“We’re seeing very few that are writing above eight now. In those situations, folks usually have to go to the California FAIR Plan, which is supposed to be a last resort. But in a lot of people’s situation, that’s their only resort,” he said.

He said he’s seeing average premiums this year that span, depending on the size and location of property and value of the home, from about $1,800 to $5,000.

Continue the conversation with Becca on Facebook.

Consumer Watchdog
Consumer Watchdoghttps://consumerwatchdog.org
Providing an effective voice for American consumers in an era when special interests dominate public discourse, government and politics. Non-partisan.

Latest Videos

Latest Releases

In The News

Latest Report

Support Consumer Watchdog

Subscribe to our newsletter

To be updated with all the latest news, press releases and special reports.

More Releases