Big Utilities Are Desperately Trying To Stick Customers For The Bills From California Wildfires

Big Utilities Are Desperately Trying To Stick Customers For The Bills From California Wildfires

By Michael Hiltzik, LOS ANGELES TIMES

May 4, 2018

http://www.latimes.com/business/hiltzik/la-fi-hiltzik-utilities-wildfires-20180504-story.html

Does there exist anywhere a whinier, more petulant, more entitled gang of businesses than California’s big utility companies?

PGE Corp., Edison International, and Sempra — the parents of Pacific Gas & Electric, Southern California Edison and San Diego Gas & Electric— connived in the state’s misbegotten electricity deregulation program of 2000-2001, then complained bitterly about how much it cost them. PG&E tried to foist a stealth ballot measure on voters to hamstring competing public power agencies. The companies have mismanaged their nuclear power plants to the point that one of the two plants has been prematurely shut down and the other will soon be in mothballs.

And now the utilities, which earned a combined $3 billion in profits last year on nearly $41 billion in revenues, are moving on several fronts to limit their liability for wildfires sparked by their own lines or equipment. Their goal is to stick taxpayers or their customers — rather than their own shareholders — for the costs of damages resulting from those fires.

They’re concerned because under the strict liability doctrine prevailing in California in cases of fire damage related to utility facilities, owners of damaged homes or property don’t have to show that the fires were the result of negligence to collect from the utilities.

The causes of the most recent wildfires in California, which took 44 lives in the wine country and destroyed thousands of homes in Northern and Southern California, haven’t yet been fully established. But utility equipment, including downed and live power lines, is often implicated in such events.

According to state officials, power lines and electrical equipment are a leading cause of wildfires — linked to the scorching of 149,241 acres in 2015, the latest year for which figures are available. That’s more than twice the acreage burned by any other cause. Utilities are responsible for cutting back vegetation that could come into contact with electrical equipment and loose tree limbs that could bring down lines.

The utilities argue that climate change is making wildfires worse, in part by turning California’s woodlands hotter and drier. At a meeting in mid-January with state policymakers, the three major utilities argued that this is imposing “a disproportionate share of the risk” on their customers and shareholders, according to talking points they prepared for the meeting.

They warned that their very existence is under threat from what PG&E told me through a spokesman is their “essentially unlimited liability” for wildfire-related damages.

That exposure, the company says, “undermines the financial health of the state’s utilities, discourages investment in California and has the potential to materially impact the ability of utilities to access the capital markets.… All of these are bad for customers and bad for the state of California.”

Heightening the utilities’ fears, last November a California Public Utilities Commission administrative law judge rejected San Diego Gas & Electric’s bid to pass $379 million in expenses from three 2007 wildfires in San Diego County on to its ratepayers.

The judge ruled that the utility failed to “reasonably manage and operate its facilities” prior to the blazes. If the ruling stands, SDG&E’s shareholders will be on the hook. That’s a signal that the PUC may expect the utilities to do much more to reduce the chances that lines and equipment can spark fires in dry, forested areas.

Consumer advocates naturally are skeptical of the utilities’ poor-mouthing. “There is absolutely no evidence these companies would go bankrupt,” says Jamie Court, president of Consumer Watchdog. “They’re basically looking for a get-out-of-jail-free card.”

Yet there is wide agreement that California may need to reconsider how to apportion the costs of wildfire damage. “The fire costs are going to be increasing, and there’s probably a limit to what the utilities have the capacity to do,” says Sean Hecht, an environmental law expert at UCLA. “This is emblematic of a whole host of problems we’re going to see from climate change, where in the aggregate everybody loses and the question is how you allocate those costs.”

But the process involves a delicate balancing act. Even if the utilities deserve some relief from their liability for fire damage, Hecht says, the prospect they’ll have to compensate victims for property damage gives them an incentive to harden their systems against the chance that they may spark a fire. And the suggestions for providing relief tend to amount to imposing costs on someone else, such as taxpayers.

The utilities are fighting on two fronts to limit their liability. One is the state legislature.

“They’ve been working hard in this building trying to change the narrative around wildfires,” state Sen. Jerry Hill (D-San Mateo) told me from his capitol office in Sacramento. “They say it’s climate change, it’s the ‘new normal,’ and we shouldn’t hold them responsible anymore. They’re doing everything they can to change the law to protect themselves.”

The industry is supporting a bill introduced by Sen. Bill Dodd (D-Napa) creating a new procedure for setting standards for utility activities in fire zones. Dodd’s measure would require the utilities to submit plans to the PUC encompassing safety rules, standards and practices. As long as a utility adhered to its plan, the PUC would be required to allow it to recover damage expenses from ratepayers, even if its equipment contributed to a fire.

Critics say the bill undermines the prevailing standard setting forth when customers, rather than shareholders, bear the costs of utility operations. Currently, customers pay for utility expenses through their rates as long as the PUC finds that a utility has incurred those “prudently.” Dodd’s bill would automatically deem a utility’s actions “prudent” as long as it remained in compliance with its fire safety plan.

But no plan can foresee all the ways that a utility might screw up, says Tom Long, legal director of the consumer advocacy group the Utility Reform Network (TURN). Dodd’s bill, he says, places sharp limits on the PUC’s discretion with the goal of “shifting the risk from shareholders to ratepayers.”

Dodd says his bill aims to force utilities to file comprehensive safety plans proactively and stick to them, or face “very significant penalties,” although those aren’t specified in the bill. He has amended the measure to give the PUC more authority over the plans, but Long says the bill still is excessively favorable to the utilities.

The utilities’ second front is in state court, where they’re mounting an attack on a legal principle known as inverse condemnation. The principle says that when a governmental or quasi-governmental entity takes property for a public benefit, the cost should be spread among all members of the community.

In the event of wildfires, it means that the owners of damaged property should be compensated without having to show their losses were caused by utilities’ negligence, only that the losses were linked to utility activities.

In two lawsuits over past California fires, PG&E and Southern California Edison have argued that inverse condemnation should be abandoned. They say the doctrine presupposes that they can spread the costs from fire damage throughout the community by absorbing them into rates. But the November ruling against SDG&E, they say, shows that there’s no guarantee they can do so.

Legal experts say that’s an unpromising argument, since inverse condemnation is an implicit provision of both the California and U.S. constitutions. Indeed, on Tuesday a judge in Sacramento County Superior Court rejected PG&E’s motion to overturn its liability under inverse condemnation in a case involving the 2015 Butte fire, which destroyed 475 homes in Amador and Calaveras counties.

“PG&E has all the benefits of a governmental entity,” says Steven Campora, a lawyer representing victims of the Butte fire. “They have a monopoly and a guaranteed profit, the right of eminent domain and access to your private property to put their lines in, yet they don’t want the burden of inverse condemnation. For some reason they think they shouldn’t have personal responsibility like the rest of us.”

A hearing on Edison’s similar motion in Los Angeles County Superior Court in a case involving the Round fire, which injured four persons and destroyed 40 homes in Inyo and Mono counties, is set for June 15. Also pending are lawsuits linking Edison to the Thomas fire, which destroyed more than 1,000 buildings in Ventura and Santa Barbara counties.

Experts warn against relieving utilities of their liability for fire damage, lest they lose the incentive to maintain safety standards. “It’s still the case that the utilities are the best placed to prevent failure at their facilities,” says Alejandro Camacho, a professor at UC Irvine law school. “It’s foreseeable that these failures will cause real harms to people, so over the next several decades, they should work their darndest to make sure these harms don’t occur.”

Keep up to date with Michael Hiltzik. Follow @hiltzikm on Twitter, see his Facebook page, or email [email protected].

Return to Michael Hiltzik’s blog.

UPDATES:

7:26 a.m., May 5: This post has been corrected to reflect that the lawsuit scheduled for a June 15 hearing involves the Round fire, not the Thomas fire.

Pulitzer Prize-winning journalist Michael Hiltzik writes a daily blog appearing on latimes.com. His business column appears in print every Sunday, and occasionally on other days. As a member of the Los Angeles Times staff, he has been a financial and technology writer and a foreign correspondent. He is the author of six books, including “Dealers of Lightning: Xerox PARC and the Dawn of the Computer Age” and “The New Deal: A Modern History.” Hiltzik and colleague Chuck Philips shared the 1999 Pulitzer Prize for articles exposing corruption in the entertainment industry.

Latest Energy Videos
Video thumbnail
Who is Behind SB 540?
02:29
Video thumbnail
ABC 7: Controversial CA Energy Bill Moves Forward
08:15
Video thumbnail
KCBS-LA (CBS) - Los Angeles, CA: Late-Night Vote Can Spike Gas Prices
02:26
Video thumbnail
KCAL-LA - Los Angeles, CA: How Will Phillips 66 Closing The Refinery Impact Consumers At The Pump?
03:04
Video thumbnail
KCBS-LA (CBS) - Los Angeles, CA: Phillips 66 To Close Refinery
03:01
Video thumbnail
KGO-SF (ABC) - San Francisco, CA: Controversy Over SF's Bottle Bank Pilot
04:40
Video thumbnail
KTLA-LA (CW) - Los Angeles, CA: Newsom Signs Gas Law Aimed At Preventing Spike In Gas Prices
03:14
Video thumbnail
KNBC-LA (NBC) - Los Angeles, CA: New CA Law Aims To Protect Gas Price Spikes
02:14
Video thumbnail
KTTV-LA (FOX) - Los Angeles, CA: New Laws On Oil And Gas In California
03:04
Video thumbnail
Consumer Alert: Newsom Takes on Gasoline Price Spikes
00:31
Video thumbnail
KCBS-LA (CBS) - Los Angeles, CA: Chevron Moving Headquarters to TX
03:03
Video thumbnail
KGTV-SD (ABC) - San Diego, CA: Californians Overcharged For Gas in 2015
01:55
Video thumbnail
KTXL-SAC (FOX) - Sacramento, CA: Oil Windfall Profits Law Under Microscope
06:06
Video thumbnail
KGTV-SD (ABC) - San Diego, CA: Watchdog Blames Oil Industry For High Prices
02:26
Video thumbnail
KGTV-SD (ABC) - San Diego, CA: Who's To Blame For Recent Spikes In Gas Prices?
02:16
Video thumbnail
Support Oil Driller Accountability, AB 3155
00:54
Video thumbnail
Consumer Alert: The Buck Stops This Summer
01:29
Video thumbnail
New Consumer Alert Exposes Deceptive Oil Industry Attack On Governor Newsom
01:39
Video thumbnail
KOVR-SAC (CBS) - Sacramento, CA: Signs Fueling Debate Over Gas Tax
02:24
Video thumbnail
Consumer Alert: More Deceptive Big Oil Ads Targeting California
01:31
Video thumbnail
KGO-SF (ABC) - San Francisco, CA: CRV Fee on Alcohol Starts On January 1st
02:31
Video thumbnail
Consumer Alert: Deceptive Oil Ads
01:38
Video thumbnail
Consumer Alert: Big Oil’s BS Mailer
01:52
Video thumbnail
KABC-LA, CA: Lawmakers Should Prevent Refineries from Selling Expensive Summer Blend of Gas Overseas
02:58
Video thumbnail
KPIX-SF (CBS) - San Francisco, CA: California Gas Prices Are Soaring Again
00:32
Video thumbnail
KCAL-LA - Los Angeles, CA: Gas Prices Skyrocketing
02:52
Video thumbnail
KTLA-LA (CW) - Los Angeles, CA: So Cal Gas Prices Nearing $6 a Gallon
03:20
Video thumbnail
Spectrum News 1 (San Fernando Valley) - Los Angeles, CA: Controversy Over Gas Storage Facility
03:50
Video thumbnail
KFMB-SD (CBS) - San Diego, CA: Gas Tax Increase Takes Effect July 1st
03:23
Video thumbnail
CBS 8 - Los Angeles, CA: What You Need to Know About Gas Prices
02:02
Video thumbnail
KGO-SF (ABC) - San Francisco, CA: BottleBank Update, Is It Really Effective?
02:39
Video thumbnail
Senator Portantino, Shame on You
01:18
Video thumbnail
Senator Portantino: Protect Our Communities From Oil Drillers
00:51
Video thumbnail
KERO-BFL (ABC) - Bakersfield, CA; Oil Drilling Near Homes Can Cause Health and Safety Concerns
03:06
Video thumbnail
KNBC - LA, CA; Consumer Watchdog's Liza Tucker On New Concerns With Santa Susana Field Lab Clean Up
04:09
Video thumbnail
(ABC) - LA, CA; SoCal Edison's New Income Based Proposed Charges Might Not Be As Stable As They Seem
02:40
Video thumbnail
(CBS)-Fresno, CA; Victory For Californians As Bill Passes That Will Regulate Profits Of Oil Refiners
02:17
Video thumbnail
CNBC - Jamie Court Speaks About The Bill That Would Penalize Oil Refineries For Price Gouging
06:39
Video thumbnail
KXTV(ABC) - Sacramento, CA; Governor Newsom Announced A New Deal With Lawmakers To Take On Big Oil
02:56
Video thumbnail
KNBC-LA (NBC) - Los Angeles, CA; Holding Utility Companies Accountable For Power Outages
02:01
Video thumbnail
Consumer Watchdog at CA Senate Energy Cmte 2 22 23
50:54
Video thumbnail
KFMB CW - San Diego, CA; Oil Companies Need to be Held Accountable for High Gas Prices
02:42
Video thumbnail
KTTV (FOX) - Los Angeles, CA; Recap Of Jamie Court's Testimony At The Senate Hearing For Gas Prices
05:07
Video thumbnail
KGTV(ABC) - SD, CA; Jamie Court Will Testify at the Price Gouging Hearing for Rising Gas Prices
01:17
Video thumbnail
KTTV-LA (FOX) - Los Angeles, CA; SoCal Gas Bill Sticker Shock
04:24
Video thumbnail
Spectrum News 1 - Los Angeles, CA; Who Is SoCal Gas Buying Their Gas From?
09:18
Video thumbnail
Why SoCal Gas is at Fault For Doubling Your Natural Gas Bill
01:43
Video thumbnail
KNBC - Los Angeles, CA; Spike In Natural Gas Prices
02:32
Video thumbnail
KCBS - Los Angeles, CA; New Year, New Pain At The Pump
03:02
Latest Energy Report

Subscribe to our newsletter

To be updated with all the latest news, press releases and special reports.