Insurance

Calpers Protests PacifiCare Severance;

October 18, 2005  ·  Consumer Watchdog

<h3>Top executives are poised to receive $345 million in merger-related bonuses if United Health's acquisition goes through.</h3><p class="source">CFO Magazine</p> <p>According to the Foundation for Taxpayer and Consumer Rights, the $345 million in bonuses is "enough money to provide health care to 115,000 Californians for an entire year." </p>

Governor’s star status pays off;

October 17, 2005  ·  Consumer Watchdog

<h3>Appearances lead to campaign giving - and raised eyebrows.</h3><p class="source">Sacramento Bee</p> <p>Doug Heller, executive director of the Foundation for Taxpayer and Consumer Rights in Santa Monica, which frequently criticizes Schwarzenegger's fundraising, said there is a connection between such vetoes and campaign contributions.</p>

Motorists, Repairers Complain of Steering;

October 10, 2005  ·  Consumer Watchdog

<h3>Insurers in the state continue to push work toward garages they contract with, critics say.</h3><p class="source">Los Angeles Times</p> <p>According to complaints from the auto repair industry, insurance companies use a variety of tactics to evade the 2-year-old law, telling policyholders that work at their chosen body shops might not be guaranteed or fully covered or might be delayed.</p>

Conspiracy charge moves phone-locking case forward

October 10, 2005  ·  Consumer Watchdog

<p class="source">RCR Wireless News</p> <p>Similar lawsuits in Tennessee and South Carolina may end up in Cote's court. A court in Alameda County, Calif., is considering phone lock lawsuits filed by the Foundation for Taxpayer and Consumer Rights.</p>

Provider of home coverage probed

October 5, 2005  ·  Consumer Watchdog

<p class="source">Contra Costa Times (Walnut Creek, CA)</p> <p>On top of administrative penalties, the Foundation for Taxpayer and Consumer Rights argues Farmers Insurance should pay refunds to any customer who was improperly charged. "This company thinks it can break the law without being held accountable," said Harvey Rosenfield, founder of the Santa Monica-based consumer watchdog group, which petitioned the Department of Insurance to participate in the proceedings. "It's an arrogant, outrageous practice by an arrogant, outrageous company."</p>

Louisiana Insurance Chief’s Huge Task;

October 5, 2005  ·  Consumer Watchdog

<h3>Commissioner Aims to Restore Trust of State's Battered Citizens;<br>Glad Only 'a Tree Fell on Your Roof'</h3><p class="source">THE WALL STREET JOURNAL</p> <p>Mr. Wooley accepted $577,000 in campaign contributions from insurers in 2003 and 2004, according to the Foundation for Taxpayer and Consumer rights. Soon after he was elected, he successfully championed a measure letting insurers raise or cut rates by up to 10% without regulatory approval. He deemed it necessary to draw more insurers to the state, and the number was rising before Katrina. Opponents dubbed the measure "the Wooley tax," predicting, accurately, that rate hikes would outpace declines.</p>

Governor signs insurance package;

October 3, 2005  ·  Consumer Watchdog

<h3>Three of state Sen. Martha Escutia's bills dealing with insurance coverage have been signed into law</h3> <p class="source"> Whittier Daily News (California) </p> <p> Doug Heller, executive director of the Foundation for Taxpayer and Consumer Rights, said that by encouraging more people to purchase insurance, the program already is saving consumers money. "It's less likely that we'll be hit by uninsured drivers,' Heller said. "It means the cost of insurance will go down as more people get insured." </p>

National focus on election unlikely;

October 2, 2005  ·  Consumer Watchdog

<h3>Eight initiatives on special vote ballot</h3><p class="source">Ventura County Star (California)</p> <p>"As a Californian, I think our legislative and regulatory decisions should be made in the interests of businesses and residents here in California," Doug Heller with FTCR said. Noting that the special election has been driven by Schwarzenegger and is being conducted only at the governor's insistence, he said, "Californians are being driven to the polls in part by out-of-state interests and their influence on the process."</p>

Wind or water? Big difference for insurers

October 2, 2005  ·  Consumer Watchdog

<p class="source">Pioneer Press (St. Paul, MN)</p> <p>The Foundation for Taxpayer and Consumer Rights, based in Santa Monica, Calif., argues it shouldn't matter whether wind or water did the damage, since Hurricane Katrina was the initial cause of all of the damage. Foundation spokesman Doug Heller says the problem is complicated by the fact that many Gulf state residents are reporting difficulty obtaining copies of their insurance policies, which could delay the claims process.</p>

The Tipping Point for Health Care Reform

September 30, 2005  ·  Jerry Flanagan

<p class="source">The Press-Enterprise (Riverside, CA)</p> <p>The fact that the cost of providing a year's worth of health insurance for a family is now more than the entire annual income of a minimum wage worker could signal the tipping point for health care reform.</p>

Insurer discount tossed by court

September 29, 2005  ·  Consumer Watchdog

<p class="source">Sacramento Bee</p> <p>SB 841 was written by Sen. Don Perata, D-Oakland, and signed by then-Gov. Gray Davis. Doug Heller of the Foundation for Taxpayer and Consumer Rights said both Davis and Perata - now the Senate leader - benefited heavily that year in donations from Mercury Insurance, a sponsor of the bill.</p>

Auto Policy Discount Rejected;

September 28, 2005  ·  Consumer Watchdog

<h3>An appeals court says Mercury Insurance can't charge previously uninsured drivers more and others less.</h3><p class="source">Los Angeles Times</p> <p>"This is going to get uninsured motorists off the road," said Harvey Rosenfield, the author of Proposition 103 and an attorney with Santa Monica-based Foundation for Taxpayer and Consumer Rights, which brought the original complaint against Mercury, a subsidiary of Mercury General Corp. of Los Angeles. Tuesday's decision by the three-judge panel upheld a 2004 finding by Los Angeles County Superior Court Judge Dzintra Janavs.</p>