Insurance

Officials in line for pensions based on jobs held briefly;

July 23, 2006  ·  Consumer Watchdog

<h3>Those who leave office in January would get retirement package based on a salary increase granted in December</h3><p class="source">Contra Costa Times (California)</p> <p>"It's outrageous," said Jamie Court, president of the Foundation for Taxpayer and Consumer Rights. "At a time when we're having to assess whether disabled Californians can get basic cost-of-living adjustments, it's outrageous for constitutional officers to take a platinum parachute from the public based on a salary they only had for a couple days."</p>

Insurance groups sue to halt new regulations

July 21, 2006  ·  Consumer Watchdog

<p class="source">The San Diego Union-Tribune</p> <p>Doug Heller, executive director of the Foundation for Taxpayer and Consumer Rights, whose founder Harvey Rosenfield wrote Proposition 103, said insurers like the status quo "because they have made so much money off of us. They're afraid that the $2 billion in profits that they made in 2005 from California drivers might come down."</p>

Auto insurers attack rules;

July 21, 2006  ·  Consumer Watchdog

<h3>Suits fight new rate setting tied to driver's record, not ZIP code.</h3><p class="source">Sacramento Bee</p> <p>"The voters made it very clear that auto insurance rates should be based on how you drive, not where you live," said Doug Heller, executive director of the Foundation for Taxpayer and Consumer Rights in Santa Monica.</p>

Insurers sue Calif. over new auto rules

July 21, 2006  ·  Consumer Watchdog

<p class="source">Associated Press</p> <p>"We will fight to ensure that this anti-consumer lawsuit does not stop the savings that good drivers have been waiting nearly two decades to receive," said Douglas Heller, executive director of the Foundation for Taxpayer and Consumer Rights. "With auto insurers coming off the most profitable year in a generation, customers should view with contempt any insurance company that joins this lawsuit."</p>

Insurers sue to block rate-setting rules;

July 21, 2006  ·  Consumer Watchdog

<h3>INDUSTRY CONTENDS AUTO PREMIUMS WILL RISE UNDER NEW REGULATIONS</h3><p class="source">San Jose Mercury News (California)</p> <p>The insurance companies "are dragging their feet in the mud,'' said Douglas Heller, executive director of the Foundation for Taxpayer and Consumer Rights, a non-profit consumer group. "They just want to charge drivers as much as they want if they live in communities that they don't like. This is a last-ditch effort.''</p>

Groups urge revocation of stem-cell patents;

July 19, 2006  ·  Consumer Watchdog

<h3>CALIFORNIA'S INSTITUTE MAY BE HARMED, THEY SAY</h3><p class="source">San Jose Mercury News (California)</p> <p>The Foundation for Taxpayer and Consumer Rights and the Public Patent Foundation petitioned the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office to revoke three patents held by the Wisconsin Alumni Research Foundation. The public interest groups contend the patents -- issued in 1998, 2001 and 2006 -- never should have been granted and are "causing significant public harm" by forcing some U.S. scientists to pursue stem-cell studies in other countries where the patents aren't enforced.</p>

DRIVING LESS WILL CUT INSURANCE PREMIUM;

July 19, 2006  ·  Consumer Watchdog

<h3>YOUR RATE NO LONGER FIGURED BY ZIP CODE</h3><p class="source">Modesto Bee</p> <p>Department officials said that under the new regulations, a person's driving record and miles driven are the top two factors in insurance rates. "You should call your agent or your insurance company and say you need to be re-rated," Doug Heller with FTCR said.</p>

UW stem cell patents face challenge: Groups say ownership of rights hurts research, drives scientists away

July 19, 2006  ·  Consumer Watchdog

<p class="source">Milwaukee Journal Sentinel (Wisconsin)</p> <p>A California-based consumer group and a stem cell scientist took action Tuesday to overturn the landmark patents on human embryonic stem cells held by the Wisconsin Alumni Research Foundation, claiming that the patents hinder research, drive scientists overseas and waste taxpayer money.</p>

Prop. 89: So Good It’s Scary — to Sacramento

July 19, 2006  ·  Consumer Watchdog

<p class="source">The Los Angeles Times</p> <p>"Teachers' ideas should be strong enough to sway politicians; otherwise, their students are in trouble," said Court. "But this union, like many other people, believe they are heard because of the power of their money and not the power of their ideas. Prop. 89 is going to be a recall of politics as usual."</p>

Groups, scientist want to overturn WARF’s stem cell patents

July 19, 2006  ·  Consumer Watchdog

<p class="source">Associated Press </p> <p>The Public Patent Foundation, the Foundation for Taxpayer and Consumer Rights, and Jeanne Loring, a stem cell scientist at the Burnham Institute for Medical Research in California, claim that the patents hinder research, push scientists to pursue work overseas and represent a waste of taxpayer money. "It's absolutely absurd that one person or organization could own the rights to life itself," said John Simpson, stem cell project director of the Foundation for Taxpayer and Consumer Rights, based in California.</p>

Stem cell patents challenged

July 19, 2006  ·  Consumer Watchdog

<p class="source">Sacramento Bee</p> <p>The group argues that the patents are overly broad and will discourage companies from bringing stem cell treatments to market. The issue is particularly glaring in California, where many hope to see medical breakthroughs from $3 billion in bond funding authorized by Proposition 71. "We don't think the research developments are going to come to fruition" if the patents stand, said John Simpson, spokesman for the Foundation for Taxpayer and Consumer Rights. "That's why we're trying to break the patents."</p>

Level playing field for whom?

July 17, 2006  ·  Consumer Watchdog

<p class="source">Eureka Times Standard (California)</p> <p>The telephone and cable companies claim all they want is a level playing field. To that, I say horse-pucky. Foundation for Taxpayer and Consumer Rights president Jamie Court says: "Nobody cared about leveling the playing field for the consumer. The consumer gets the shaft here."</p>