Medical Malpractice Executive Testifies That Malpractice Caps Do Not Reduce Risk

Consumer Watchdog

Expose. Confront. Change.

Donate

Home About Us

Our Approach Our Team Our Books Contact

Updates

News Releases Consumer Alerts Video In The News Reports

Our Issues

Healthcare Energy Privacy Insurance Accountability In The Courtroom

Get Involved

Submit a Complaint Take Action

Donate Now

Insurance

Medical Malpractice Executive Testifies That Malpractice Caps Do Not Reduce Risk

PUBLISHED ON June 10, 2003 | BY CONSUMER WATCHDOG · 1 MIN READ

Written Testimony of SCPIE Executive In Response to Prop 103-Challenge to Rate Increase

Written testimony of SCPIE Assistant Vice President and Associate Actuary James Robertson, who claims that California’s malpractice caps law, known as MICRA, does not reduce the risk of malpractice insurance in California. * See, in particular, page 4

Consumer Watchdog

Providing an effective voice for American consumers in an era when special interests dominate public discourse, government and politics. Non-partisan.

All Articles →

Written Testimony of SCPIE Executive In Response to Prop 103-Challenge to Rate Increase

MORE IN INSURANCE

Consumer Watchdog Says CEA Report Fails To Evaluate Viable And Popular Options To Deal With Wildfire Crisis

CA Dept of Insurance Finds Rebuilding Fire-Safe From LA Fires Would Reduce Losses by One-Third; Survivors Back Bill Requiring Insurers to Cover Fire-Safe Homes

Thirty-two Groups Urge Insurance Commissioner to Withdraw Proposed Intervenor Regulations; Rules Would Undermine $530 Million State Farm Settlement

Consumer Watchdog Announces Settlement in State Farm Insurance Rate Case Saving California Consumers Approximately $530 Million

Utilities, Insurers, Oil Companies Must Pay Their Fair Share, Groups Say As CEA Finalizes Study Addressing Who Pays for Catastrophes

Consumer Alert: State Farm: 4 in 5 Fire Survivors Say They’re Livin’ On A Prayer