Insurance

Covered California Becomes a Prime Target in Proposition 45 Debate

October 14, 2014  ·  Mark Reback

<p>Proposition 45 would extend the regulatory power that Proposition 103 gave the state Insurance Commissioner over property and casualty coverage to a new branch of the insurance market: the health policies sold to individuals and small groups. So it's no surprise that the Proposition 45 campaign would turn into a reprise of 1988's battle over Proposition 103, pitting the consumer advocates at Consumer Watchdog against big insurance companies.</p>

Prop. 45 Poop Protest

October 14, 2014  ·  Mark Reback

<div class="atclear"> </div> <p><img alt="" border="0" src="http://content.clearchannel.com/cc-common/mlib/616/10/616_1413320456.jpg" style="float:right;" width="180" />Photo: Jo Kwon</p> <p>A pickup truck packed with poop has been hand-delivered to Blue Shield in El Segundo.</p> <p>The delivery was from a group that supports Proposition 45. If passed, the state insurance commissioner would have to approve insurance rate hikes.</p> <p>Consumer Watchdog’s Cody Rosenfield was deep in the dung and volunteered to shovel the stuff into buckets.</p>

Why I Support Prop 45: Health Insurance Hell on Three Fronts

October 13, 2014  ·  rob

<div class="rtecenter" style="font-size: 12px; background-color: rgb(255, 255, 255);"><span style="font-size: 16px;"><span style="font-size: 16px;"><em style="font-size: 16px;"><strong style="font-size: 16px;">“Premiums for our company have gone up 37% since 2010, and our yearly health insurance dread just came in for 2015: HMO premiums up 7% and PPO up 9%. We can’t afford this. I don’t know what to do.”</strong></em></span></span></div>

California Gives No-Bid Health Pacts

October 12, 2014  ·  Mark Reback

<p> </p>

Editorial: Prop. 45: Health Insurance

October 10, 2014  ·  Mark Reback

<div class="entry"> <p><strong>Editorial:</strong></p> <p><strong>Prop. 45: Health Insurance. Allows state’s insurance commissioner to reject health insurance price changes.</strong><br /> <em>Requires insurance commissioner’s approval before health insurer can change its rates or anything else affecting the charges associated with health insurance. Provides for public notice, disclosure, and hearing, and subsequent judicial review. Exempts employer large group health plans.</em></p>

Prop 45 Would Give Insurance Commissioner Final Say on Health Premiums

October 9, 2014  ·  Mark Reback

<p><a href="http://kvpr.org/post/prop-45-would-give-insurance-commissioner-final-say-health-premiums">Click here to listen to the audio of this radio news segment</a>.</p> <p>A measure on the November ballot would give California’s elected insurance commissioner power to reject health insurance premium increases for people in individual and small group plans. But as Health Care Reporter Pauline Bartolone in Sacramento explains, that policy change would be more complicated than it seems.</p>

Californians Split Over Letting Official Veto Insurers’ Rate Boosts

October 8, 2014  ·  Mark Reback

<p style="font-size: 15px;">Californians are split over a high-profile voter initiative that opponents say could complicate the future of President <a href="http://topics.wsj.com/person/O/Barack-Obama/4328">Barack Obama</a> ’s health-care law in one of the states that has gone furthest to embrace it.</p>

Op-Ed: Why California Needs Prop. 45

October 8, 2014  ·  Mark Reback

<p><strong>For health insurance to be affordable, someone has to keep rates in check.</strong></p> <p>If you believe the advertising on television, health insurance in California is now the best deal since sliced bread.</p> <p>Four health insurance companies, which control 84% of the California market, are spending tens of millions of dollars to convince voters they have it so good that the state doesn't need Proposition 45. The November ballot measure would simply give the insurance commissioner the right to reject excessive health insurance rates.</p>

CityBeat’s Nov. 4 Election Endorsements

October 8, 2014  ·  Mark Reback

<p><font face="verdana" size="2"><b>Proposition 45 </b></font></p> <p><font face="verdana" size="2">Health-insurance behemoth Blue Cross Blue Shield and managed-care companies Well-Point and Kaiser Permanente have spent a combined $37 million to try to convince you to vote no on Prop. 45. If you hate insurance companies—and we don’t blame you—voting yes should make you feel <i>really </i>good.</font></p>

SFBG Endorsements: PROP. 45 — HEALTH CARE INSURANCE – YES

October 7, 2014  ·  Mark Reback

<p><strong>PROP. 45 — HEALTH CARE INSURANCE<br /> YES</strong><br />

Health Insurers Are Spending Millions to Defeat California’s Proposition 45

October 7, 2014  ·  Mark Reback

<div id="content-only-wrapper-block"> <p>From the start, even fans recognized that one of Obamacare’s great weaknesses was its failure to regulate insurance rates. Washington orders you to buy insurance, but can’t police how insurance companies raise your rates, a decision that made the Affordable Care Act a big moneymaker for the insurance industry.</p>

Props 45 & 46: This Won’t Hurt. Much

October 7, 2014  ·  Mark Reback

<p><i>The following analyses represent my opinions. The SD Free Press editorial board may or may not agree with me. For all our articles on the upcoming election, check out our <a href="http://sandiegofreepress.org/category/politics/nov-2014-election/#.VDNkovldW-Y" target="_blank" rel="noopener">2014 Progressive Voter’s Guide.</a></i></p> <p>There are no special interests more special than insurance companies, doctors and lawyers. Here we have two propositions involving all three groups. And there is more subterfuge going on than anybody can keep track of.</p>