Insurance

Op-Ed: Insurers must comply with Prop. 103

July 5, 2003  ·  Consumer Watchdog

<p class="source">Alameda Times-Star (Alameda, CA)</p> <p>Why should great drivers who happen to live in challenged neighborhoods effectively subsidize lousy drivers who are lucky enough to live in better communities? It's all a matter of how insurers use ZIP codes to determine premiums.</p>

Assembly committee backs bill pushed by major campaign donor

July 3, 2003  ·  Consumer Watchdog

<p class="source">Oakland Tribune</p> <p>Opponents said it would violate Proposition 103's ban on basing rates on lack of prior insurance and would result in higher premiums for drivers who have gaps in their coverage. Often those drivers are among the poorest in the state, they said.</p>

Mercury Insurance-sponsored SB 841 Will Surcharge Drivers Least Able to Afford It

July 2, 2003  ·  Consumer Watchdog

<!-- excerpt --><p>SB 841 contains an exemption for soldiers sent abroad, but what about'</p>

Insurance Impunity

July 1, 2003  ·  Consumer Watchdog

<p class="source">The American Prospect</p> <p>Harvey Rosenfield, president of the California-based Foundation for Taxpayer and Consumer Rights, says when he originally read the Utah court's opinion, he thought State Farm would lose its license to practice in several states.</p>

Insurance Impunity

July 1, 2003  ·  Consumer Watchdog

<p class="source">The American Prospect</p> <p>Harvey Rosenfield, president of the California-based Foundation for Taxpayer and Consumer Rights, says when he originally read the Utah court's opinion, he thought State Farm would lose its license to practice in several states.</p>

California’s malpractice-suit cap eyed in Pennsylvania Congress

June 30, 2003  ·  Consumer Watchdog

<p class="source">Philadelphia Inquirer</p> <p>"Prop 103 is the real deal," said Jamie Court, executive director of the Foundation for Taxpayers and Consumer Rights in Santa Monica, which wrote 103. "MICRA is basically Milli Vanilli lip-synching."</p>

Insurance companies decry effort to reassess homeowner risk

June 30, 2003  ·  Consumer Watchdog

<p class="source">Los Angeles Business Journal</p> <p>Insurers are challenging Insurance Commissioner John Garamendi's efforts to limit the industry use of electronic claims data in underwriting homeowners' policies.</p>

Corporateering Book Review

June 27, 2003  ·  Jamie Court

<p class="source">The San Francisco Bay Guardian</p> <p>Corporateers invade our privacy, trick us with deceptive advertising, attack our rights of organization and association, compromise press freedom, erode our rights to use the courts, endanger our health and safety, corrupt our electoral system, and turn p</p>

The language of change;

June 19, 2003  ·  Jamie Court

<h3>'Corporateering' and how corporate power steals your personal freedom</h3><p class="source">Pasadena Weekly</p> <p>How many times have you declined to pick up the phone to follow-up something because you dreaded the voice-mail hell or disempowered employee that you knew you'd encounter? You've been corporateered!</p>

STATE TELECOM ACTIVITIES

June 17, 2003  ·  Consumer Watchdog

<p class="source">Communications Daily</p> <p>The Cal. Senate's Constitutional Amendments Committee advanced a bill (SCA-6) for a constitutional amendment that would make the Cal. PUC an elected body rather than appointed.</p>

Medical Malpractice Executive Testifies That Malpractice Caps Do Not Reduce Risk

June 10, 2003  ·  Consumer Watchdog

<h3>Written Testimony of SCPIE Executive In Response to Prop 103-Challenge to Rate Increase</h3> <p>Written testimony of SCPIE Assistant Vice President and Associate Actuary James Robertson, who claims that California's malpractice caps law, known as MICRA, does not reduce the risk of malpractice insurance in California. * See, in particular, page 4</p>

Corporateering: Jamie Court on Commerce, Culture, and ‘the Good Life’

June 10, 2003  ·  Jamie Court

<p class="source">Publishers Weekly Daily</p> <p>We've got to create better opportunities to dissent within the corporation. There has to be more dissent within the culture as well about what corporations do inappropriately.</p>