<h3>The opinion of the Mercury News</h3><p class="source">San Jose Mercury News</p>
<p>Vote yes on 30 and 31 to make sure insurance companies are accountable</p>
<!-- excerpt --><p>This is a detailed look at how no fault laws have worked in practice. Data from no fault states shows that no fault increases premiums while restricting consumers' rights.</p>
<!-- excerpt -->
<p>
Santa Monica, California-based RAND Corporation has repeatedly issued studies suggesting that no fault will lower premiums (even though it never has). This is a review and discussion of the RAND reports, along with correspondence from FTCR to RAND que</p>
<h3>Sacramento Bee Editorial</h3><p class="source">Sacramento Bee</p>
<p>Voters, beware: Propositions 30 and 31 on the March ballot are trick questions. Insurance companies have already spent millions of dollars to qualify the two measures for the ballot and will spend millions more trying to persuade voters to vote No. The pu</p>
<!-- excerpt --><p><i>Testimony of Douglas Heller, Consumer Advocate <br> Foundation for Taxpayer and Consumer Rights <br> Presented to the California Department of Insurance <br> Thursday, November 9, 2000 </i><br></p>
<p class="source">USA TODAY</p>
<p>Harry and Louise, the TV ad characters used by the insurance industry to help defeat President Clinton's health reform plan, take to the airwaves again Wednesday.</p>
<!-- excerpt --><p>An internal video of Aetna lawyers training claims managers about procedures for denying claims shows the insurer considers liability exposure in determining whether or not to pay a policyholder's claim</p>