Insurance

End this Stem Cell Racket;

November 1, 2006  ·  Consumer Watchdog

<h3>Once the Bush Administration policy is fixed, there's another problem that's at least as large. $400,000 per license to work with stem cells: outrageous</h3><p class="source">The Scientist Magazine</p> <p>Let's apply pressure to change the current policy on embryonic stem cells. November 7th's midterm elections may provide an opportunity to do that. But let's also look at supposed proponents of such research and see whether their intellectual property rights are holding things up. If they are, time to make that change too. Sometimes the enemy is us.</p>

Build public trust in stem cell institute

November 1, 2006  ·  John M. Simpson

<p class="source">The Sacramento Bee (California)</p> <p>The California Institute for Regenerative Medicine is going to dole out $3 billion in taxpayer money over the next decade to support the state's stem cell researchers. Everyone concerned claims they want a transparent process to ensure that awards are based on scientific merit, not favoritism and cronyism. Despite mouthing high-minded slogans, the institute's leaders frequently miss the mark whenever there is a clear opportunity to transact the public's business in public. Bottom line: They want our money. They must tell us who they are and ask for it in public</p>

Build public trust in stem cell institute

November 1, 2006  ·  John M. Simpson

<p class="source">The Sacramento Bee (California)</p> <p>The California Institute for Regenerative Medicine is going to dole out $3 billion in taxpayer money over the next decade to support the state's stem cell researchers. Everyone concerned claims they want a transparent process to ensure that awards are based on scientific merit, not favoritism and cronyism. Despite mouthing high-minded slogans, the institute's leaders frequently miss the mark whenever there is a clear opportunity to transact the public's business in public. Bottom line: They want our money. They must tell us who they are and ask for it in public.</p>

Angelides vs. Schwarzenegger – The public trust;

October 30, 2006  ·  Consumer Watchdog

<h3>Latest ads in governor's race focus on integrity.</h3><p class="source">The Orange County Register (California)</p> <p>When he was elected, Arnold promised to end political games where "money goes in; favors go out." Then he raised more than $110 million for his campaigns. Schwarzenegger says he never promised not to take money.</p>

California initiative would limit corporate spending;

October 29, 2006  ·  Consumer Watchdog

<h3>Corporate contribution limits called ploy, fair</h3><p class="source">Sacramento Bee (California)</p> <p>A recent study by the Foundation for Taxpayer Rights, which supports Proposition 89, said the state's 10 top corporate donors had contributed half of the money raised for measures on the Nov. 7 ballot -- $132 million of $255 million, through Oct. 17.</p>

‘Orgy’ of spending on political ads — $500 million breaks state record

October 27, 2006  ·  Consumer Watchdog

<p class="source">THE SAN FRANCISCO CHRONICLE</p> <p>"The amount of money being spent in 2006 blows away every other record," said Carmen Balber, spokeswoman with the Foundation for Taxpayer and Consumer Rights, based in Santa Monica. "We have the most prolific fundraising governor in state history and ballot measures that are attracting record amounts of spending. "It's a half billion dollars, and most of it is being spent to protect the status quo," she said.</p>

State planning to fire health care official;

October 27, 2006  ·  Consumer Watchdog

<h3>He worked on OK for acquisition by group he invested in</h3><p class="source">THE SAN FRANCISCO CHRONICLE</p> <p>Jerry Flanagan, of the Foundation for Taxpayers and Consumer Rights, called on the state auditor to review the UnitedHealth-PacifiCare merger in light of the conflict-of-interest charge. "What this means is that it (the department's review) was a sham and the outcome had been decided before," he said.</p>

Blue Cross settles lawsuits;

October 19, 2006  ·  Consumer Watchdog

<h3>Patients claimed they were dumped by their insurer</h3><p class="source">THE SAN FRANCISCO CHRONICLE</p> <p>Consumer advocates said settlements and fines don't go far enough. "Blue Cross settling these 70 lawsuits doesn't protect tens and thousands of Californians at risk," said Jerry Flanagan of the Foundation for Taxpayer and Consumer Rights. "The only way to do this is for the regulators to establish new rules."</p>

Kaiser Told to Reinstate Coverage;

October 19, 2006  ·  Consumer Watchdog

<h3>Regulators' action in a kidney patient's case comes as scrutiny over cancellations grows.</h3><p class="source">The Los Angeles Times</p> <p>Consumer lawyers and patient advocates say changes implemented by health plans in response to lawsuits and other criticism do not go far enough. "Decisions about when insurance can be denied or revoked must be taken out of the hands of insurers who have a financial incentive to refuse to pay when we get sick and need it most," said Jerry Flanagan, a healthcare advocate with the Foundation for Taxpayer and Consumer Rights.</p>

Political ad replays on YouTube;

October 19, 2006  ·  Consumer Watchdog

<h3>BACKERS HOPE EXTRA EXPOSURE SPURS PROPOSITION 89</h3><p class="source">San Jose Mercury News (California)</p> <p>The ad, which hit TV markets around the state this week, is the No. 1 political ad on YouTube, where it's been viewed 16,000 times in less than 48 hours, supporters said. That's 10 times more than the Proposition 87 ad featuring former President Clinton.</p>

Meds seizure policy shifting;

October 19, 2006  ·  Consumer Watchdog

<h3>Small shipments from Canada OK</h3><p class="source">The Record (Bergen County, NJ)</p> <p>Jerry Flanagan of the Foundation for Taxpayer and Consumer Rights said the government still has not done anything about the underlying problem; the high price of American drugs. His group thinks the federal government should adopt a Canadian-style approach to drug-cost management and negotiate with the pharmaceutical industry to buy American medicines in bulk.</p>

Blue Cross Settling Patients’ Lawsuits;

October 18, 2006  ·  Consumer Watchdog

<h3>The big insurer, accused of illegally canceling some policies, agrees to pay its ex-customers.</h3><p class="source">The Los Angeles Times</p> <p>Consumer advocates said they feared that unless regulators got tough on insurers, the practice would continue and the opportunity for meaningful reform could be lost. "Regulators have to come in with a big stick, because otherwise Blue Cross and the other HMOs are going to buy off the individuals," said Jamie Court, president of FTCR, based in Santa Monica. "This has to be about more than money. It's got to be about forcing the companies to uphold the law, and that's the job of the regulators."</p>