Energy

Yes on 87: The Oil Companies’ Web of Fiction

August 22, 2006  ·  Consumer Watchdog

<p class="source">PR Newswire US</p> <p>Put the oil companies front and center in your advertising, instead of hiding behind front people and concealing the true backers of the campaign against Proposition 87: Chevron, Shell, Exxon Mobil, Occidental and other oil companies. </p>

California initiative Prop 87 would tax oil to aid renewables, alternatives

August 17, 2006  ·  Consumer Watchdog

<p class="source">Electric Power Daily</p> <p>Beth Willon, spokeswoman for the Yes on 87, dismissed conflict-of-interest concerns, calling them "oil company fiction." The No on 87 campaign has raised about $30 million so far, and oil producers Chevron and Aera Energy have made the biggest donations.</p>

Yes on Prop 87 — Secretary of State Albright Backs Initiative

August 17, 2006  ·  Consumer Watchdog

<p class="source">PR Newswire US</p> <p>Proposition 87 will reduce our use of foreign oil and increase the use of domestic fuel sources and will not increase gas prices or reduce oil production. That has been proven in Alaska, Louisiana, Texas and every other oil producing state in the nation, which have for decades charged drilling fees similar to the one called for by Prop 87. Prop 87 is a $4 billion effort to reduce California's dependence on gasoline and diesel by 25% over the next 10 years, which will be funded by oil drilling fees paid by oil companies.</p>

Market cited in high gas prices

August 16, 2006  ·  Consumer Watchdog

<p class="source">The San Diego Union-Tribune</p> <p>Jamie Court, president of the Foundation for Taxpayer and Consumer Rights in Santa Monica, likened the state's gasoline market to what took place during the electricity crisis. "Oil companies are ripping off Californians in exactly the same way as electricity profiteers -- by shorting the market," Court said. He called on Schwarzenegger, who ordered the report, to return millions of dollars of campaign contributions from the energy industry.</p>

Report finds no evidence of manipulation in Calif. price spike;

August 16, 2006  ·  Consumer Watchdog

<h3>But the study focused on underlying market forces affecting prices, not whether there was manipulation by oil companies.</h3><p class="source">Associated Press</p> <p>A consumer group and a spokesman for state Treasurer Phil Angelides, Schwarzenegger's Democratic opponent in the November election, criticized the report. Jamie Court, president of the Santa Monica-based Foundation for Taxpayer and Consumer Rights, called it a "whitewash." "Oil companies are ripping off Californians in exactly the same way electricity profiteers did by artificially shorting the market," he said.</p>

Gas price not pumped up;

August 16, 2006  ·  Consumer Watchdog

<h3>State report says that oil companies didn't withhold supplies</h3><p class="source">THE SAN FRANCISCO CHRONICLE</p> <p>Consumer advocates greeted the report with scorn. They compared the price increase to California's energy crisis five years ago, when some power plant operators drove up electricity prices by shutting. "When outages or shutdowns of refineries are behind a big price spike, it shows there is a motive for the industry to keep supplies artificially low so prices can go up," said Jaime Court, president of the Foundation for Taxpayer and Consumer Rights, a group frequently critical of oil companies.</p>

Refiners Not Faulted for Gas Prices;

August 16, 2006  ·  Consumer Watchdog

<h3>Consumer advocates immediately branded study as apology for oil industry</h3><p class="source">The Los Angeles Times</p> <p>Jamie Court, president of the Foundation for Taxpayer and Consumer Rights, said he was outraged by the high number of unplanned refinery outages. He called the commission's report a "whitewash" that ignored evidence that the oil companies "are artificially shorting the market to drive up prices."</p>

Drivers likely hurt by BP oil shutdown

August 10, 2006  ·  Consumer Watchdog

<p class="source">Associated Press</p> <p>Soaring profits have also opened BP up to much criticism over why it hasn't dedicated ample funds toward safety and maintenance yet has plunged about $36 billion into stock buybacks since 2000. This week's news confirms what many have chided the company for lately: an explosion last year at BP's Texas City, Texas, refinery that killed 15; a large oil spill at Prudhoe Bay earlier this year that has become part of a criminal investigation; and allegations of energy-market manipulation by BP traders this summer.</p>

Oilfield Closure to Hit Pumps;

August 8, 2006  ·  Consumer Watchdog

<h3>A shutdown in Alaska will affect refiners in Western states, but it's not clear how badly. Pessimists say gas could reach $4 a gallon.</h3><p class="source">The Los Angeles Times</p> <p>"Every increase in the price of crude oil is translated immediately into more gravy for the oil companies, because they don't just pass through the price of crude oil; they take on indefensible profits for the oil itself and then again at the refinery," Judy Dugan with FTCR said. "Drivers will pay through the nose for this very preventable emergency."</p>

A costly hitch in the pipeline;

August 8, 2006  ·  Consumer Watchdog

<h3>Corrosion will force lengthy shutdown in Alaska; more pain at the pump seen as early as this week</h3><p class="source">The San Diego Union-Tribune</p> <p>The Foundation for Taxpayer and Consumer Rights said BP's maintenance practices underscore the industry's failure to put money back into its businesses, despite record profits. "Drivers will pay through the nose for this very preventable emergency," said Judy Dugan, research director for the Santa Monica group.</p>

Angelides puts money on public election finance;

August 4, 2006  ·  Consumer Watchdog

<h3>Support could rile candidate's major union contributors</h3><p class="source">THE SAN FRANCISCO CHRONICLE</p> <p>Jamie Court, president of the Foundation for Taxpayer and Consumer Rights, also stoked the flames earlier this week when he suggested that "only a genuine campaign finance overhaul like Prop. 89 could force big labor and big business onto the same team, because no cash-rich special interest will be able to buy the Legislature if Prop. 89 passes.''</p>

Angelides endorses campaign-finance reform

August 3, 2006  ·  Consumer Watchdog

<p class="source">The San Jose Mercury News (California)</p> <p>The initiative (Prop 89) is supported by the Foundation for Taxpayer and Consumer Rights, which has criticized both Republicans and Democrats for taking special interest money. "The real question is will Gov. Schwarzenegger join him?" said Jamie Court, president of the Santa Monica-based foundation. "This is exactly what Arnold Schwarzenegger said he wanted to do -- to clean up corruption and end the backroom deals."</p>