Consumer Watchdog

Expose. Confront. Change.

Consumer Watchdog

Privacy

Consumer Watchdog investigations and advocacy on data privacy, surveillance, AI, and your right to control your personal information.
Take the politics out of the money

Take the politics out of the money

<p class="source">Marketplace Radio Program (American Public Media)</p> <p>A poll out today from Pew and the Associated Press says voters' interest this fall is the highest it's been in more than a decade. Americans are talking politics at home and around the office water cooler. They're going to campaign events. They're talking about it in church. And they're opening up their pocketbooks. Best guesses are something near two billion dollars will be plowed into the mid-term elections. But commentator and consumer advocate Jamie Court says the trick is to change how that money's spent.</p>
Take the politics out of the money

Take the politics out of the money

<p class="source">Marketplace Radio Program (American Public Media)</p> <p>Members of Congress are back in their districts campaigning hard, many on the dime of lobbying groups after not passing any lobbying and ethics reform. Commentator and consumer advocate Jamie Court says it all comes down to getting what you pay for.</p>
Council passes on “Clean Money”

Council passes on “Clean Money”

<p class="source">Pasadena Weekly</p> <p>The proposition is supported by the California Nurses Association, the League of Women Voters of California, original Measure B-sponsors the Foundation for Taxpayer and Consumer Rights and various senior, minority, union, environment and peace groups. Several activists attended Monday's meeting to urge the council to endorse Proposition 89, including a nurse who blamed insurance company spending on political campaigns for stifling health care reform, a local business owner and members of the senior community.</p>
WARF stem cell patents challenged;

WARF stem cell patents challenged;

<h3>Research could get faster and cheaper if the patents are narrowed, some scientists say</h3><p class="source">The Scientist Magazine</p> <p>Patenting all human embryonic stem cells is "like Microsoft patenting computing," said John Simpson of California's Foundation for Taxpayer and Consumer Rights, one of the groups challenging the patents. "It's overreaching." Simpson worked with attorney Dan Ravicher of the Public Patent Foundation and stem cell researcher Jeanne Loring of the Burnham Institute to file the challenges to the WARF patents, which cover discoveries by James Thomson, a University of Wisconsin-Madison developmental biologist whose group was the first to isolate human embryonic stem cell lines in 1998. </p>
Candid forecast on stem cell research hopes;

Candid forecast on stem cell research hopes;

<h3>10-year outlook cautions against early results from $3 billion plan</h3><p class="source">THE SAN FRANCISCO CHRONICLE</p> <p>John Simpson, stem cell specialist at the Foundation for Taxpayer and Consumer Rights in Santa Monica, said, "It's a good thing to be realistic and not to raise hopes that aren't justified." </p>
Stem cell plans include creation of embryo bank

Stem cell plans include creation of embryo bank

<p class="source">The San Diego Union-Tribune (California)</p> <p>"During the Proposition 71 campaign, proponents implied that miraculous cures were just around the corner," said John M. Simpson, stem cell project director for the Foundation for Taxpayer and Consumer Rights in Santa Monica. "This plan acknowledges just how difficult the task ahead is and is a welcome change from the hype that has all too often been associated with stem cell research. Californians are entitled to an honest assessment of the prospects for research they are funding."</p>
Stem-cell patents to be reviewed

Stem-cell patents to be reviewed

<p class="source">Wisconsin State Journal</p> <p>The review was requested by the Los Angeles-based nonprofit Foundation for Taxpayer and Consumer Rights, which is involved in California's new $3 billion stem-cell research initiative. The watchdog group and others involved in the initiative have been sparring with WARF over the patents and associated commercial research license fees to use stem cells. The licenses range from $75,000 to $400,000.</p>
Stem cell patents get a review;

Stem cell patents get a review;

<h3>Case challenges licenses, royalty claims by University of Wisconsin</h3><p class="source">THE SAN FRANCISCO CHRONICLE</p> <p>John Simpson, stem cell project director for Santa Monica's Foundation for Taxpayer and Consumer Rights, said the Wisconsin organization is making it more difficult for academic laboratories and biotech companies to explore the potential of stem cells to advance medicine. "We see these (patents) as a very big impediment to the free flow of ideas that's necessary to get viable cures out of stem cell research,'' he said.</p>
Foundation-held stem cell patents to be re-examined;

Foundation-held stem cell patents to be re-examined;

<h3>High fees, restrictive guidelines have objectors seeking reversal</h3><p class="source">The San Diego Union-Tribune (California)</p> <p>"We're pleased the (patent office) has decided to re-examine these patents," said John M. Simpson, of the Foundation for Taxpayer and Consumer Rights in Santa Monica. "The patents should never have been issued in the first place."</p>
Cable TV, Drug Bills Signed;

Cable TV, Drug Bills Signed;

<h3>One law will let phone companies compete to sell pay television services. The other aims to cut medication costs for the uninsured.</h3><p class="source">The Los Angeles Times</p> <p>Jamie Court, president of the Foundation for Taxpayer and Consumer Rights in Santa Monica, predicted that the law would lead to higher pay TV bills and poor service, because it gives the PUC little leverage over the phone or cable companies. He called it a gift to AT&T and Verizon. "This bill was wired by millions in campaign contributions and lobbying from AT&T and Verizon and tens of millions of dollars in aggressive media [ads] to thank Speaker Nunez and others."</p>