<h3>The 1.25% fee, added to property insurance bills, would boost firefighting and aid overall budget. Critics call it a tax.</h3><p class="source">Los Angeles Times</p>
<p>As the money came in, the governor could cut existing funds from firefighting agencies and use it to help close a budget gap that his office projects at $14 billion, said one consumer advocate, who asked why the burden would fall on property owners instead of insurance companies. "If the governor wants to fill the budget gap, he should find an honest way to do it," said Doug Heller, executive director of the Foundation for Taxpayer and Consumer Rights. "He's wrong to target insurance customers, whose premiums are already too high."</p>