Google Should Answer Some Searching Questions

Published on

Google woos people with its
“don’t be evil” slogan and assures us that everything it does is meant
to enhance our online experience. But a new study by US advocacy group Consumer
– of which I am part – has found evidence that the internet
giant’s search results are skewed to its own advantage.

With billions of web pages in existence and more being added every
day, search engines are the gateway to the internet. They should be
neutral – that is, their results should be comprehensive, impartial and
based solely on relevance.

In the US, Google is used by around 65 per cent of people. In some
countries its market share tops 90 per cent. Most people’s experience
of the internet is determined by how Google lists its search results.

In 2007, Google launched “Universal Search”, which blends results
from its own sites, such as images and video, with what it gathers from
trawling web pages. Our study found evidence suggesting that Universal
Search is squeezing out Google’s competitors by producing search results
that favour its own products and services. For example, many search
results now display a Google map on the first page.

We found evidence suggesting that Universal Search is squeezing
out Google’s competitors

Since 2007, traffic to Google sites has soared. In video, Google’s
YouTube has increased its market share from 40 per cent to 80 per cent,
while its rival Photobucket,
which once had 20 per cent, now has less than 3 per cent. In still
images, Google Images’ share has increased from 43 per cent to 55 per
cent, while Photobucket has fallen from 31 per cent to 10 per cent and
Yahoo has fallen from 12 per cent to 7 per cent. Google Maps had around
20 per cent of market share in 2007, but now dominates with 51 per

Of course, Google could be succeeding because its offerings are
better than its competitors’, but differences in quality do not appear
to account for such radical shifts in traffic.

Google claims its search is neutral, but our study
suggests it is not: you increasingly see what Google wants you to see
and go where Google wants you to go.

John M. Simpson is a consumer advocate with Consumer Watchdog, a
non-profit, non-partisan public interest group with offices in
Washington DC and Santa Monica, California

Consumer Watchdog
Consumer Watchdog
Providing an effective voice for American consumers in an era when special interests dominate public discourse, government and politics. Non-partisan.

Latest Videos

Latest Releases

In The News

Latest Report

Support Consumer Watchdog

Subscribe to our newsletter

To be updated with all the latest news, press releases and special reports.

More Releases