NYT editorializes against federalization of insurance regulation

Published on

We’ve been posting a lot about big insurers’ cynical plot to win deregulation as part of the federal financial overhaul — e.g. Auto, Home and Other Insurers Pushing Deregulation Proposal To Opt Out of State Rate Regulation, Consumer Protections.  A few weeks ago the New York Times published an op-ed by Allstate’s CEO making the pitch with the ironically titled piece "Regulate Me, Please." 

The legislation that Allstate (and State Farm and the other bigs) wants would create an optional federal charter for insurers, in which companies could opt out of traditional state regulation and instead select a new federal overseer.  The New York Times editorial rightly calls this "Regulator Geithner.gifShopping."  Earlier in the year, Treasury Secretary Tim Geithner explained why this is crazy (and then awkwardly offered some support for it, see our video and our action page.

In this May 21, 2009 editorial the Times makes the case against this proposal and against the broader effort to use the national banking crisis (itself a result of deregulation) to leverage the weakening of state oversight of the insurance industry. 

At play here is the power of the insurance industry that has
clamored for federal — weaker — regulation for nearly a decade. The
industry, and its Congressional supporters, are trying to use the
current upheaval to advance a predetermined agenda.

The effort is disingenuous — and a shame.

I couldn’t agree more.

Consumer Watchdog
Consumer Watchdoghttps://consumerwatchdog.org
Providing an effective voice for American consumers in an era when special interests dominate public discourse, government and politics. Non-partisan.

Latest Videos

Latest Releases

In The News

Latest Report

Support Consumer Watchdog

Subscribe to our newsletter

To be updated with all the latest news, press releases and special reports.

More Releases