California’s Insurance Practices Challenged

Published on

Organizations Urge Commissioner To End Use Of Occupation And Education History To Create Rates

By Staff Reporters, SACRAMENTO OBSERVER

February 28, 2019

LOS ANGELES – Community organizations representing consumers, low-income workers and communities of color petitioned Insurance Commissioner Ricardo Lara to ban the use of occupation and education to set auto insurance premiums.

Many California auto insurance companies charge lower-income and less-educated drivers up to 15 percent more in order to give discounts to doctors, lawyers, other well-paying professions, and drivers with college degrees. The surcharge is illegal under California’s insurance reform law, Proposition 103″These

unfair surcharges drive up the cost of insurance for people who can least afford it,” said the groups’ petition. “They also skirt civil rights protections to allow insurers to charge non-white, lower-wage drivers more.”

The organizations signing the petition include: United Policyholders, Public Advocates, Presente.org, Neighborhood Assistance Corporation of America, La Casa de la Raza, KIWA (Korean Immigrant Workers Alliance), Courage Campaign, Consumer Watchdog, Consumers for Autó Reliability and Safety, Consumer Federation of America and Consumer Action.

An analysis of online premium quotes revealed that seven of the 10 largest auto insurers in California overcharge drivers without college degrees or higher-paying professions. The surcharges at Farmers, GEICO, Progressive, AAA, Allstate, Liberty Mutual and Mercury range from 3-5 percent to 14.7 percent based on a person’s occupation and education level. State Farm, USAA and AAA Northern California do not use education or occupation as rating factors.

Examples of the price difference for drivers with a basic Coverage policy include:

? Farmers Insurance charges a factory worker a 14.5 percent higher annual premium than either an accountant or a physician ($1,523 vs. $1,330).

? Progressive Auto Insurance charges a factory worker 6.3 percent more in annual premiums than an attorney or a physician ($878 vs. $826), and an office manager with a high school diploma 6.3 percent more than the same driver with the same job who has an undergraduate degree.

* GEICO charges a factory worker 14.7 percent higher annual premiums than the same driver who is a corporate CEO ($977vs. $852).

The surcharge for drivers insured with Allstate was 3.5 percent, 8.1 percent with AAA, from 5 percent to 10 percent at Liberty Mutual and from 3-7 percent to 6.5 percent at Mercury.

California’s insurance reform law, Proposition 103, requires auto insurance rates to be based primarily on a driver’s safety record, miles driven and driving experience. It banned the use of arbitrary and irrelevant personal characteristics to discriminate against drivers. Companies must prove any additional rating factors are “substantially related to the risk of loss” and be approved by the Commissioner. Companies are using occupation .and education illegally because they have never been approved under Prop 103.

“Voters banned insurance redlining with Prop 103 by requiring insurance rates to be based on how you drive, not who you are. Insurers are using job and education as an end run around those protections. It’s time to put a stop to this illegal and discriminatory pricing for California drivers,” said Carmen Balber, executive director of Consumer Watchdog.

Communities of Color Hit Hardest

Communities of color are the hardest-hit by this discriminatory pricing. In 2017, just 32.6 percent of Californians over the age of 25 had a bachelor’s degree or higher. That number falls to 12.2 percent of Latinx and 24 percent of Black Californians with a bachelor’s degree or higher. Latinx and Black Californians also earn lower median incomes than White Californians. Undocumented Californians in particular are most likely to have jobs in low-paying industries like agriculture, child care, restaurants, hotels and construction.These communities all pay more to subsidize discounts for drivers with better-paid professions, said the groups.

“ALL Californians deserve to be treated fairly when they get auto insurance, especially since they are required to have insurance, in order to drive a car,” said Rosemary Shahan, President of Consumers for Auto Reliability and Safety.

Most insurance companies do not disclose the financial impact of occupation and education surcharges on lowincome and less-educated drivers. However, Farmers’ October 2018 rate filing provides enough data to approximate the financial impact on its policyholders. Approximately 1.2 million “regular” drivers insured by Farmers each pay, on average, $99.21 more per year than the higher-income professionals in the company’s Business and Professions Group I program. Collectively, that overcharge for Farmers customers amounts to approximately $125,441,124 a year based solely on a driver’s occupation.

Consumer Watchdog
Consumer Watchdoghttps://consumerwatchdog.org
Providing an effective voice for American consumers in an era when special interests dominate public discourse, government and politics. Non-partisan.

Latest Videos

Latest Releases

In The News

Latest Report

Support Consumer Watchdog

Subscribe to our newsletter

To be updated with all the latest news, press releases and special reports.

More Releases